Thursday, September 28, 2006

ABC's of Land Use workshop

Saturday, October 7, 2006
9:00 AM to 1:00 PM
North Portland Neighborhood Services
Historic Kenton Firehouse
2209 N. Schofield

Learn about the City of Portland's land use and development review processes. Get hands-on experience responding to typical issues that come up in land use reviews. This is a free workshop.


Presenters include Marguerite Feuersanger from the Bureau of Planning and a representative from the Bureau of Development Services.

For more info online: http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=38146
Click here for the flier
Click here to register online.

What you will learn:
• Overview of how state, Metro, and City land use goals and policies are organized.
• What Land Use Reviews (LUR's) are.
• The difference between Type I, II, IIx and III applications.
• How to read a land use notice and how to respond.

Who should attend:
• Neighborhood and Business Association land use and transportation activists
• Anyone thinking about getting more active with their Association's land use or transportation committees
• Anyone interested in general City related land use decision-making processes

To register or to get more information:
Click here to register online. ( use this link if the first doesn't work http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=43205&)


Or contact Brian Hoop at 503-823-3075 or bhoop@ci.portland.or.us

Space is limited to the first 30 people who register.

Transportation:
Several blocks west of Yellow Line MAX stop in Kenton, or Bus: #6, MLK Jr.

Accessibility:
TTY, 823-6868
Site is wheelchair accessible.
Call 7 days advance to request assistance for any accessibility accomodations and/or language interpretation.

Co-Sponsored by:
City of Portland, Office of Neighborhood Involvement and North Portland Neighborhood Services, Bureau of Planning, Bureau of Development Services.

Brian Hoop
Interim Manager
Neighborhood Resource Center
City of Portland, Office of Neighborhood Involvement
City Hall, 1221 SW 4th Ave., Room 110
Portland, OR 97204
Work: (503) 823-3075
Cell: (503) 793-5451
Fax: (503) 823-3050
TTY: (503) 823-6868
bhoop@ci.portland.or.us
www.portlandonline.com/oni
City of Portland Information & Referral: (503) 823-4000

Letter from Clown House 2425 NE Alberta.

Dingo the clown here, at the Clown House 2425 NE Alberta.
I wasn't going to say anything, but you did email twice, so I felt I needed to respond.
We are looking for greener pastures in other cities since for the third time we have been classed out of our neighborhood. We came here to spread goodwill, and entertain the masses like we were born to do, but we can hardly afford to live here ... I don't think we would want to, much longer.
As you may have seen in the street parade, the artists who made this place well known and who poured their souls into community are having to scatter, looking for affordable housing.
Who wants to celebrate a strip of restaurants, anyway?
We are managing to stay an extra year because we thought the street theater we put on each month would generate enough to cover the $300 rent increase. Turns out, people rarely tip and all the money went back into the show. As a team, we pull in $30 for five hours work.
We are performers and activists. We are also not booze hounds, and we all have day jobs.
We are under contract to stay another year, and have just enough to pay
for it.
So. if you want to know what my vote is to do with an empty lot, build a parking building. We are all car free, but we still like throwing water balloons.
I'm not trying to sound harsh, Oma, I can tell that you are doing what you can to make the world a better place, and I bet some folks are real proud of you. That's the best I can hope for in anyone.
You didn't know what was going on here, so I don't fault you for trying
to get opinions, that's great.
We have been “The Clown House” now for almost 10 years, I
think we can find new digs.


Dingo
clownhouse.org

Monday, September 18, 2006

survey about the future of our city

You are invited to participate in an extraordinary discussion about the future of our city.

This is your opportunity to discuss your vision of Portland, the relationship that the people of Portland should have with their government, and the structure of government needed to make such a relationship work. Your input will be incorporated into planning efforts to develop a citywide vision, a community engagement model, and recommendations to reform the City's Charter.

As someone who cares about the City of Portland, you have a wealth of information and experience to contribute. We hope you will take a moment to participate in this process that will not only preserve Portland as one of the most livable cities, but also help it grow into the community you would like it to become.

Community Connect (formerly BIP #8) has designed a customized survey for current and former members of District Coalition Boards and Neighborhood Associations. Please take a moment to tell us how you'd like to create a new system of engagement by visiting the link below:

http://www.portlandonline.com/mayor/index.cfm?action=UpdateItem&category_id=550&c=39381


Your responses will be used to create a new model of engagement and will appear online anonymously as part of a final report. All respondents can enter into a drawing to attend a lunch with Mayor Potter. Winners will be announced in October.

Thank you for telling us what you think!


Questions? For more information on Community Connect, scroll down, visit www.portlandonline.com/bip , or contact Community Connect at 503-823-4433 or johnell.bell@ci.portland.or.us.

Community Connect
Community and Government Working Together

It's been more than 30 years since the Office of Neighborhood Involvement (ONI) was created to support the neighborhood system and much has changed. Community Connect has been tasked with creating a system to deepen the community's role in local government in an effort to strengthen each of Portland's communities. This system will empower all Portlanders to be involved in local decision-making and community building. Supported by Mayor Potter, Community Connect is led by a group of community volunteers and neighborhood leaders.

To do this work effectively, the process has been divided into three phases -

Dream June 2006 - September 2006
Bringing together diverse community interests, we will ask community members what works really well and what could be better. We will focus our efforts on creating dialogues across the city and gathering input. We will talk with people currently engaged in the neighborhood system and work with community organizations and networks to engage people who currently aren't involved. This information will begin to frame an enhanced and strengthened community participation system in our city.

Design October 2006 - February 2007
We will take the information we heard in the Dream phase and begin to compare it to national and international best practices and models. How do other cities support local decision-making? How are the systems funded? Who makes decisions? The committee will then propose one or more models that reflect the goals, values and needs of our community. The model(s) will then be presented to the public for feedback, which will help create the most inclusive community engagement model for all.

Destiny March 2007 - June 2007
During the last phase of this project, after talking with a broad spectrum of Portlanders, we will work with City Council, the Office of Neighborhood Involvement, community organizations, neighborhood associations and others to begin to strengthen our community participation system. We will identify our next steps to becoming more inclusive and engaging while also identifying necessary community and city resources to implement our model.

Disaster Psychology and Trauma workshops

The training is free. An additional tidbit from Lawrence is that we will expedite the turnaround for folks who still want to register. So, It’s not too late!

-Ethan


Ethan Jewett wrote:
Woodlawn NET - Fall Training Dates Announced Hello neighbors,

Lawrence from POEM posted the training dates last week while I was out of town. The good news is that enough people have already registered so that they can justify a Wednesday night and Saturday class, making it much easier for everyone to match up their schedules. Both tracks finish up before the Thanksgiving holiday. Some of you who have already received the registration packet may already have this info:

FALL 2006 COURSE OUTLINE AND DATES

Session #1: Wednesday, 9/27 or Saturday, 9/30
Disaster Awareness & Home Preparedness
Neighborhood Preparedness and NETs

Session #2: Wednesday, 10/4 or Saturday, 10/7
Utility Control
Fire Extinguishers
Hazardous Materials

Session #3: Wednesday, 10/11 or Saturday, 10/14
Disaster Medicine: Life-Threatening Injuries and Medical Triage

Session #4: Wednesday, 10/18 or Saturday, 10/21
Disaster Medicine: Treating Common Injuries and Secondary Patient Assessment

Session #5: Wednesday, 10/25 or Saturday, 10/28
Building Size-Up/Visual Damage Assessment
Urban Search Techniques

Session #6: Wednesday, 11/1 or Saturday, 11/4
Rescue Techniques and Patient Transport

Session #7: Wednesday, 11/8 or Saturday 11/11
Disaster Psychology and Trauma Intervention
NET Team Organization
NETs in Action--Tabletop Exercise

Final Exercise: Saturday, 11/18 only

FALL 2006 TRAINING LOCATION and TIMES

All Wednesday sessions will be held 6:30 – 9:30 PM.

All Saturday and Sunday sessions will be held 9:00 AM – 12:00 Noon.

All sessions will be held at the Portland Fire & Rescue Training Center, 4800 NE 122nd Avenue, just north of Sandy Blvd. Use the building entrance nearest the flagpole.

To register, call 503-823-1260 or go to http://www.portlandonline.com/oem/index.cfm?c=31667


If you see a schedule conflict, keep in mind that you can switch to the other track to make it up or even wait until the next training (winter or spring) . . . You’ll still be on the team in the meantime. As always, if you have any questions feel free to contact the team at woodlawnnet@gmail.com
One of us will get back to you as soon as possible.

thanks,

Clarence Harper
Ethan Jewett
WOODLAWN NET

Communication from NECN

August 28, 2006


Dear Neighborhood Association Chair/ President:

In our continuing efforts to improve communications and interface between NECN and our member neighborhood associations, Dick Levy, our new Recorder has asked me to write to you with the following requests:

1. Please send an e-mail version of your monthly meeting minutes –
a. This can help us better understand the issues you are dealing with and refer your
issues to our committees
b. To help us develop a networking newsletter

2. Send us a copy of your monthly, quarterly or semi-annual newsletter
a. Help build the larger community. We want to develop an on-going library resource for current and future reference.

3. Forward to us your special announcements:
a. We can assist you in disseminating your publicity to others.
b. Be a part of our outreach efforts and connecting all NECN member Associations.

Our mission is to provide support for improving livability, safety, communications for our residents and your help is critical.

We also act to represent the Northeast Portland community in matters relating to the northeast neighborhoods, Office of Neighborhood Involvement, Police Bureau, Portland Public Schools, Portland Development Commission, Portland Parks and Recreation, Tri-Met, City of Portland and volunteer agencies and stakeholders within the NECN area.

If you have any questions about the requests for this contribution to our communications central function, please e-mail Dick Levy at rclevy@comcast.net or call him at (503)249-1706 or contact Ron Laster, NECN Interim Board Chair at printresults@aol.com or (503) 287-9566 .

We welcome your cooperation in our efforts to grow NECN into a more effective and service-oriented community partner.

We thank you for assistance in advance.


Sincerely,

Cecilia Hornbuckle,
Administrative Coordinator

Neighborhood Small Grants workshop schedule

Greetings,

The September 14th Neighborhood Small Grants grant writing workshop at SEUL
is rescheduled for October 12 to take place at SE Uplift. The ONI website
has been changed to reflect the new dates.

Here is the link to the application forms for each coalition:

http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=43131&

Here you'll see the changed the dates to reflect the new workshop date

http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=43130&

Thank you,

Sandra Lefrancois
Neighborhood Involvement Specialist
Central Northeast Neighbors
4415 NE 87th Ave, Portland, OR 97220
(503) 823-2780 cnnoutreach@teleport.com
Web: www.cnncoalition.org

VNA minutes for Sept

Vernon Neighborhood Association
Sept 12th, 2006
Agenda

7:00 Introduction by chair; Lindy
New attendees introduce themselves (and sign in)
General introductions
Need for new board members

7:05 Oma goes over minutes and correspondence that are posted on the blog
Posted on www.vernonneighbors.blogspot.com the following . . .

Mayor Hosts Neighborhood Leaders!!!
ABC’s of Land Use Workshop Oct 7th
Update on 20th and Alberta
Wine on Wed. events
Tree planting announcement
Minutes of VNA meeting of Aug.
Community Workshops re: Alberta and 20th development
Alberta Street Fair Sept 16th
Street Car new board members announcement
Neighborhood grants from city
Zoning questions answered by Debbie
Web site address to type II Land Use Procedure
Land Use Committee Minutes
PDX Grants Celebration (Oct 14th)
Announcement from Tom Potter
King and Vernon Neighborhood Tour (Sept 7)
Alberta Condo currant Architectural Plans
Draft letter for design review
Draft of Aug. 2006 Alberta Business Report
Alberta Business Survey Nov. 2004

7:10 Muriel and treasurer’s report

Our VNA bank balance is $367.94 plus 20.00 cash.
1 check was issued to The Greater Solid Rock Church for children's school supplies for the sum of $95.00.
(There was $20.00 cashed donated toward that social cause)

7:15 Introduce John Fall Chair of Land Use
Land Use Report
John explains how we need to meet with the architect again. The workshops
Will in inform us about how those two blocks are designed for taller
buildings. They will be taking pictures and showing us maps and help us
brainstorm about what people what to see and don’t want to see.
It’s a tool to get everyone’s input so we will have a sense of what people
want when we meet with the developers.
Fliers were offered to everyone there about the workshop so members could
help pass them out.
Report on the neighborhood tour with Debbie Bishoff the city planner.
The condition of the commercial
buildings on Killingsworth are because the area was zoned residential, and the
buildings there are grandfathered in and when those business’s close, others
can’t move in. That zoning needs to be changed. (It was done 20 years ago).
Suggested by Crystal to have someone like Craig talk with the business
owners along this area and see if they would make any changes if they could.

7:30 Willie Brown was scheduled but it was a no show.

7:45 Rob presents draft letter for churches and non profits asking for a representative.
Letter from Rob is passed out to take a look at. Larry suggests we drop it off at business’s along Killingsworth. He volunteered to take the letters to those business’s. Crystal will do the churches, and Lindy said she would do the non-profits.

Mark Downing introduces a friend of his who is a architect and was involved in a Sellwood area and designed the Tea Houses and had a big hand in the ReBuilding Center. He has some ideas about what makes a community. Mark Downing will talk with him and see if his vision would help us in any way. www.Cityrepair.org is where you can find out more information about Mark Lakeman. Next general meeting is Oct 10th and Mark D. agreed to get hold of Mark L. and see if he can come to the next meeting.


8:00 Ajourned

Next board meeting is Oct 4th, Wed. evening @ 7:00 @ Lindy and Oma’s
Next general meeting is, Oct 10th, Tuesday @ 7:00 p.m. @ Enterbeing

Alberta Development Workshop

As you have heard, discussions with the developer of the property at
NE 20th and Alberta are finally moving with a meeting scheduled
for October 3rd with representatives from the Vernon, Condordia and King neighborhood associations and the developer. After that we'll have a good idea of what we will have to deal with.

In the meantime, the Vernon Neighborhood Association Land Use Committee will conduct 2 public workshops for all folks interested in what will be happening with that specific building, but they will also try to get a sense of what people would like to see on that street in the future.

We hope that you can make either of the two sessions and that you could get the word out to anyone else who you'd think would be interested. It's a good chance to get some background information on how design reviews work/happen and for you to express your concerns to the folks going to the October meeting.

First Workshop Date:
Thursday, September 21
6:30 - 8:30 p.m.
Redeemer Lutheran Church, 5431 NE 20th Ave. (at Killingsworth)

Second Workshop Date:
Saturday, September 23
10 a.m. to Noon
Redeemer Lutheran Church, 5431 NE 20th Ave. (at Killingsworth)

It is the same workshop, so folks only need to attend once. Please
attend one and help influence the future of Alberta!

See you there!

John Fall
Vernon Neighborhood Association Land Use Committee Chair

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

new skinny house designs being built

FYI--From a member of the Roseway NA Land-Use/Trans

Sandra Lefrancois
Neighborhood Involvement Specialist
Central Northeast Neighbors
4415 NE 87th Ave, Portland, OR 97220
(503) 823-2780 cnnoutreach@teleport.com
Web: www.cnncoalition.org

-----Original Message-----

For those of you who may remember, my neighborhood was instrumental in
starting the conversation about improving the quality of infill housing on
narrow lots in existing neighborhoods - the infamous "skinny house". Three
years of hard work has paid off with the first real permit-ready infill
house being constructed in the City.

Chris Caruso - see below for the formal announcement:


The Living Smart narrow lot house designs will begin to be built in several
locations beginning this month! Area developer Jack Wagnon will be building
2 Higgins houses in North Portland and 2 Vargas houses in SE Portland.
Additionally, a Portland couple will be building the Vargas house on a lot
adjacent to their property in SE Portland.

It is exciting to see an idea translated into action--bringing well designed
narrow lot house designs to the Portland market.

I have attached the press release and the signage that will be sent tomorrow
to the media.

Thank you for your contributions to this project.

Anne Hill

Anne Hill, Senior Management Analyst
Bureau of Development Services
City of Portland
503.823.4807

Neighborhood Small Grants Sept 14th workshop rescheduled to O ct 12

One more FYI. Each coalition area has grant money available for community
projects. The websites below explain more...

-----Original Message-----
From: Sandra Lefrancois, CNN Neighborhood Involvement
[mailto:cnnoutreach@teleport.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 1:06 PM
To: cnnoutreach@teleport.com
Subject: Neighborhood Small Grants Sept 14th workshop rescheduled to Oct 12


Greetings,

The September 14th Neighborhood Small Grants grant writing workshop at SEUL
is rescheduled for October 12 to take place at SE Uplift. The ONI website
has been changed to reflect the new dates.

Here is the link to the application forms for each coalition:

http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=43131&

Here you'll see the changed the dates to reflect the new workshop date

http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=43130&

Thank you,

Sandra Lefrancois
Neighborhood Involvement Specialist
Central Northeast Neighbors
4415 NE 87th Ave, Portland, OR 97220
(503) 823-2780 cnnoutreach@teleport.com
Web: www.cnncoalition.org

Update for Portland Neighborhood Associations

September 2006
Sam Adams, Commissioner
1221 S.W. Fourth Avenue, Rm. 220
Portland, Oregon 97204-1994
(503) 823-3008
FAX: (503) 823-3017
E: samadams@ci.portland.or.us
www.commissionersam.com
Planning for Hayden Island
Developing a Vision, Developing a Community
On October 4that 6pm, City Council will consider a
development delay or a temporary moratorium. I support
the development delay for three reasons: First, Hayden
Island and I-5 lack adequate public transportation
facilities to accommodate additional development on the
island. This section of I-5 is already considered one of
the worst freeway choke points on the US west coast.
Based on initial analysis, during weekdays, I-5 operates
at full capacity for at least seven hours each day—city
and regional policies allow only two hours at full
capacity. Second, the potential re-development of
Jantzen Beach SuperCenter could perpetuate a
dysfunctional and substandard street system on the
Island and threaten freeway access – the only way on
and off the Island. And, third, these developments should
wait until an alignment is chosen for the new $1.5 billion
Columbia River crossing.
For further information, please contact Warren Jimenez, Senior
Policy Director at 503-823-4541 or by email
wjimenez@ci.portland.or.us.
Business License Fee (BLF) Reform
Building Equity for Small Businesses
Over the past year and a half, my office has been
working on Business License Fee (BLF) Reform targeted
to help small and neighborhood businesses. Since we
first took tax reform to Council in April 2005, we have
been persistent in making the case for reform. In
October, we will be holding Townhall meetings to
discuss a draft reform package. We look forward to your
feedback on the package. Stay tuned!
For further information, please contact Warren Jimenez, Senior
Policy Director at 503-823-4541 or by email
wjimenez@ci.portland.or.us.
Big Pipe Dollars Go To Local and
Minority-Owned Firms
Committed to Investing in Portland
When construction started on the West Side Big Pipe
Project, the city’s West Side projects contractor
Impregilo-Healy (IH) hoped to award about $13 million
in subcontracts to Portland area minority, women and
emerging small businesses (M/W/ESBs). Now, as the
West Side projects near completion, IH has exceeded
that amount. IH has issued over 160 M/W/ESB
subcontracts and purchase orders and has made about
$20 million in contract payments to M/W/ESB firms.
More than 300 local businesses worked on portions of
the project, employing 450 workers at the peak of
construction. East Side Big Pipe contractor Kiewit-
Bilfinger Berger (KBB) is also off to a good start. Since
work started in March, KBB has awarded 46 M/W/ESB
contracts valued at more than $8 million, and $1.3
million in other local subcontracts
For more information please contact Maria Thi Mai, Senior
Policy Analyst mthimai@ci.portland.or.us or 503-823-4045.
Wellness Coordinator Healthy Addition
To City’s Human Resources
Prevention and Wellness are Our Goals
The city has hired a Wellness coordinator named
Barbara Meyer. Barbara will join the city on October 1st.
Barbara has worked in public health research in areas of
preventive care and tobacco control. She will be
expected to educate on health, wellness, and disease
management, develop wellness program and goals. By
fostering a heather workforce, the city hopes to meet its
goal of reducing the increase in healthcare cost by 3 to 5
percent per year.
Please feel free to contact Peggy Anet at
panet@ci.potland.or.us or 503-823-6118 if you have
questions prior to Barbara coming on board.
Watershed Investment Fund
Planning to Benefit Our Watershed
The City Council created Commissioner Sam Adams’
Portland Watershed Investment Fund in June 2006. The
Council decided to invest $500,000 from the city’s
general fund to pay for high priority projects that will
have immediate and long-lasting benefits for Portland
watersheds.
The Bureau of Environmental Services has selected the
first four Portland Watershed Investment Fund projects.
• Control invasive weeds and plant native
vegetation on 51-acres of City of Portland
Prepared by the Office of Commissioner Sam Adams
property along the Columbia Slough. The cost
estimate is $60,000.
• A demonstration stormwater retrofit on one of
the many unimproved streets in southwest
Portland to improve water quality and public
safety. The cost estimate is $155,000.
• Plant native vegetation and enhance habitat on
the west bank of the Willamette River at the
mouth of Stephens Creek. The cost estimate is
$285,000.
• Ecoroof improvements and improved public
education opportunities at the Hawthorne Youth
Hostel. The cost estimate is $25,000.
For more information please contact Maria Thi Mai, Senior
Policy Analyst mthimai@ci.portland.or.us or 503-823-4045.
I want to know if metal theft is a
problem for you and your business
Businesses along Riverside Way in the Columbia Corridor
have recently approached me about the problem of
metal theft. Several businesses are having metal stolen
right off their buildings. Thieves have literally ripped the
wire from between electrical boxes and vital machinery,
resulting in downtime. The businesses are left with
repair bills which mount into the thousands, and loss of
work that results in costly loss of revenue. There are
currently few effective mechanisms tracking the sources
of scrap metal, or the metal recycling industry.
Please contact Jane Ames if you are having problems with the
theft of metal james@ci.portland.or.us.
City Hall First Thursday Art show
celebrating the art of the
Native American Community
Thursday October 5th 5 - 7pm
Portland City Hall 1221 SW 4th
Come join Commissioner Sam Adams for the City Hall
First Thursday Art show celebrating the Native American
Community. This unique event is a collaboration
between the several community organizations and the
city to bring Native American Art to City Hall. The Native
People’s Circle of Hope artists will bring works depicting
artists’ healing process with cancer while NAYA (Native
American Youth and Family Association) is offering art
from both sides of the generational spectrum. Please
come join us for performance, art, music, and
refreshments. This event is FREE and open to the public.
If you have any questions about first Thursday, please contact
Pollyanne Birge at pbirge@ci.portland.or.us or 503-823-34046.
Capital Improvement Project Map
If you’re curious about sewer projects in your
neighborhood, the Bureau of Environmental Services has
developed a map of all its planned capital projects in the
next five years. The map sorts projects by neighborhood
to show how construction will be distributed among
neighborhoods in coming years. Environmental Services
sets sewer construction and maintenance priorities
based on sewer conditions. You can view a copy of the
five-year CIP map at www.portlandonline.com/bes.
For more information please contact Maria Thi Mai, Senior
Policy Analyst mthimai@ci.portland.or.us or 503-823-4045.
Labor Advocates Corner
Many of you may not have heard the city has a fully
dedicated Labor Liaison. Terry Richardson has been
working in of Commissioner Sam Adams’ office since
January of 2005. We are lucky to have Terry and his
extensive labor background working with us. Terry
comes to us from the private market sector, where he
served as both a union officer and a manager. His
primary responsibilities are to establish and maintain
communications, and be a conduit between all
Organized Labor and management within the
Commissioner’s Bureaus.
Please feel free to contact Terry Richardson at
trichardson@ci.portland.or.us or 503-823-4045.
Does your business need help with
a Portland City government issue?
We want to help: Contact Sam by at 503-823-
4046 or CommissionerSam@ci.portland.or.us or
contact Shoshanah Oppenheim at 503-823-1125
and Shoshanah.Oppenheimy@ci.portland.or.us.
Helpful City Numbers
Transportation Options Ambassadors Program
Ambassadors representing the Office of Transportation
present information to encourage pedestrians, cyclists,
drivers and transit riders to travel safely together - share
the road, For information call 503-823-5358.
Water/Sewer Bill
For question about fees on your water/sewer bill, Call
503-823-7770
To learn more about Clean Water Rewards
Call Rhetta Drennan 503-823-6006
To learn more about the bike to work challenge
Prepared by the Office of Commissioner Sam Adams
go to www.bikecommutechallenge.com

Monday, September 11, 2006

Mayor Hosts Neighborhood Leaders!!! - Last Chance!!!

Hello!!!

This is your last chance to RSVP!!!

We know you want to be there!!!

As you all know, the Mayor is very interested in hearing from you!!!

You have all been waiting with baited breath to share your wisdom and experience. The time is now!!!

Mayor Potter would like to invite you to join him to talk about the future of Portland, community participation and our form of government.

September 16th

Concordia College

8:30 am - 2:30 PM

Light refreshments provided

Childcare available with RSVP

RSVP by Monday, September 11 to Johnell Bell

johnell.bell@ci.portland.or.us or 503-823-4433

You will have the opportunity to talk to each other about what kind of city you want, what role you want to have in shaping it and what type of government we should have to implement it. As promised - there will be plenty of time included for you to share your successes and experiences with each other.

As leaders in your community and the City of Portland, you have a wealth of information and experience to add to these discussions. Please join us in shaping the future of Portland.

Agenda and materials will be distributed Monday, September 11th after 5:00 PM.

Thanks for all your excellent work and leadership!

E-

Elizabeth Kennedy-Wong

Policy Manager, Neighborhoods and Education

1221 SW 4th Ave., Suite 340

Portland, OR 97204

503-823-4277

ABC's of Land Use workshop Saturday, October 7th

ABC's of Land Use workshop
Saturday, October 7, 2006
9:00 AM to 1:00 PM
North Portland Neighborhood Services
Historic Kenton Firehouse
2209 N. Schofield

Learn about the City of Portland's land use and development review processes. Get hands-on experience responding to typical issues that come up in land use reviews. This is a free workshop.


Presenters include Marguerite Feuersanger from the Bureau of Planning and a representative from the Bureau of Development Services.

For more info online: http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=38146
Click here for the flier
Click here to register online.

What you will learn:
• Overview of how state, Metro, and City land use goals and policies are organized.
• What Land Use Reviews (LUR's) are.
• The difference between Type I, II, IIx and III applications.
• How to read a land use notice and how to respond.


Who should attend:
• Neighborhood and Business Association land use and transportation activists
• Anyone thinking about getting more active with their Association's land use or transportation committees
• Anyone interested in general City related land use decision-making processes


To register or to get more information:
Click here to register online. ( use this link if the first doesn't work http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=43205&)


Or contact Brian Hoop at 503-823-3075 or bhoop@ci.portland.or.us

Space is limited to the first 30 people who register.

Transportation:
Several blocks west of Yellow Line MAX stop in Kenton, or Bus: #6, MLK Jr.

Accessibility:
TTY, 823-6868
Site is wheelchair accessible.
Call 7 days advance to request assistance for any accessibility accomodations and/or language interpretation.

Co-Sponsored by:
City of Portland, Office of Neighborhood Involvement and North Portland Neighborhood Services, Bureau of Planning, Bureau of Development Services.


Brian Hoop
Interim Manager
Neighborhood Resource Center
City of Portland, Office of Neighborhood Involvement
City Hall, 1221 SW 4th Ave., Room 110
Portland, OR 97204
Work: (503) 823-3075
Cell: (503) 793-5451
Fax: (503) 823-3050
TTY: (503) 823-6868
bhoop@ci.portland.or.us
www.portlandonline.com/oni
City of Portland Information & Referral: (503) 823-4000

ABC's of Land Use workshop Saturday, October 7th

ABC's of Land Use workshop

Saturday, October 7, 2006
9:00 AM to 1:00 PM
North Portland Neighborhood Services
Historic Kenton Firehouse
2209 N. Schofield

Learn about the City of Portland's land use and development review processes. Get hands-on experience responding to typical issues that come up in land use reviews. This is a free workshop.


Presenters include Marguerite Feuersanger from the Bureau of Planning and a representative from the Bureau of Development Services.

For more info online: http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=38146
Click here for the flier
Click here to register online.

What you will learn:
• Overview of how state, Metro, and City land use goals and policies are organized.
• What Land Use Reviews (LUR's) are.
• The difference between Type I, II, IIx and III applications.
• How to read a land use notice and how to respond.


Who should attend:
• Neighborhood and Business Association land use and transportation activists
• Anyone thinking about getting more active with their Association's land use or transportation committees
• Anyone interested in general City related land use decision-making processes


To register or to get more information:
Click here to register online. ( use this link if the first doesn't work http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=43205&)


Or contact Brian Hoop at 503-823-3075 or bhoop@ci.portland.or.us

Space is limited to the first 30 people who register.

Transportation:
Several blocks west of Yellow Line MAX stop in Kenton, or Bus: #6, MLK Jr.

Accessibility:
TTY, 823-6868
Site is wheelchair accessible.
Call 7 days advance to request assistance for any accessibility accomodations and/or language interpretation.

Co-Sponsored by:
City of Portland, Office of Neighborhood Involvement and North Portland Neighborhood Services, Bureau of Planning, Bureau of Development Services.


Brian Hoop
Interim Manager
Neighborhood Resource Center
City of Portland, Office of Neighborhood Involvement
City Hall, 1221 SW 4th Ave., Room 110
Portland, OR 97204
Work: (503) 823-3075
Cell: (503) 793-5451
Fax: (503) 823-3050
TTY: (503) 823-6868
bhoop@ci.portland.or.us
www.portlandonline.com/oni
City of Portland Information & Referral: (503) 823-4000

Subject: Update on 20th and Alberta

This is an update on what's happening with the megabuilding proposed for the empty lot on 20th and Alberta. After several months of being ignored by the developers, the City of Portland hearings officer in charge of this project ordered the Emerald Constructors and Engineers and its architect Saj Jivanjee to meet with the neighborhoods.

On August 23rd, the Vernon Neighborhood Land Use Chair John Fall received a letter of notification of the project. The site is in Vernon but Concordia is within 400 feet (22nd is our border) so we are included. King NA is on board as a it covers Alberta below 15th. Our 3 associations have been meeting together all summer. Vernon had 14 days to reply - which it did, asking for a meeting with Emerald and 4 reps from each association.

The developer has agreed to meet on October 3rd. Asked by the Land Use committee to represent Concordia are: Kevin Valk, Jennifer Dzienis, and Gabe Dominek, all of whom work with architectural firms and have had experience with similar design reviews, and Matt Steadman, the economics chair for CNA's Board.

In the meantime, Vernon's Land Use committee will hold 2 public community workshops for residents and business folk of all 3 neighborhoods. We hope that you can attend one of these to look at the plans and to learn how you can affect those plans. We will discuss what options we have in this process and how to pursue them. They will be at Redeemer Lutheran Church, 5431 NE 20th (plenty of parking).

Thursday, Sept. 21, 6:30-8:30 or Saturday, Sept. 23, 10am -12 pm

There will be an official public comment opportunity later. These workshops are an opportunity to all get on the same page, so please plan to come and bring others.

(contact Katherine Krajnak at katk@pdx.edu for more info)

Thanks,
George Bruender
Concordia Land Use

"Wine on Wednesdays” Event Sept 13th, 2006

In 1991 Sabin CDC was formed when a group of concerned residents from our neighborhoods decided to address the needs in their community. Their first and foremost concern was how the rapidly rising housing costs were driving out many of their longtime neighbors. As a result of 15 years of dedicated commitment, we have successful homeownership programs, 190 units of affordable rental housing, 8 years of technology education and multimedia programming, finance literacy targeting 7 neighborhoods surrounding the Alberta Street Corridor, coupled with many awards for community impact and community service corporate support. We would like to once again encourage residents to explore the many ways Sabin CDC connects them to our community by featuring venues and events that focus on these distinctive elements; public spaces, affordable housing, community land use, neighborhood education and safety issues, public art and neighborhood festivals.

We would like to present MapClicks.com “Wine on Wednesdays” Event
September 13th, 2006

This event will include up to 11 wineries from our region, 10 restaurants located within the Alberta Street business district with advance tickets sells supporting an educational program fundraiser. Community partner we are requesting your support and participation in our celebration as a valued sponsor.

For further information please contact:
Sabin CDC 503-287-3496 Ext. 21 or 25
__________

Thursday, September 07, 2006

Vernon Neighborhood Tree Planting!

Join us on February 17th at 8:45 am for the Vernon Neighborhood Tree Planting!
Questions? Contact Amy at (503) 936-5340 or vernontrees@gmail.com
Deadline for turning in interest form below is November 1st, 2006.

Join the Vernon Neighborhood Tree Planting!

In partnership with Friends of Trees, the Vernon neighborhood is planning a tree planting project for February 17th, 2007! We are looking for homeowners and landlords interested in receiving trees at a greatly reduced cost in exchange fore helping us plant trees on this Saturday morning in February. Help make Vernon a greener, healthier, more beautiful neighborhood!

What are the Benefits?
Did you know that trees remove pollutants from the air? A typical tree absorbs 10 pounds of pollutants, cleans 330 pounds of carbon dioxide, and creates 260 pounds of oxygen each year! Trees also help intercept and retain 760 gallons of rainwater each year, which help keep our rivers clean and help save us money on stormwater fees! Trees can cool our homes in the summer and shade our city which helps us stay cool all summer! Trees raise the property value of your home by up to 20%. Also, unlike many other things, trees appreciate in value each year! And by planting trees now, we can keep our city green into the future.

What’s the Cost/ How Do I Get Involved?
This winter, the Vernon Neighborhood is teaming up with Friends of Trees to offer homeowners trees for their parking strip for only $35 or trees for their yard for $75. The cost will include a site inspection by the Urban Forestry Department to ensure you choose the right tree for your home, hole digging, help with planting your tree, stakes, mulch, ties, labels, follow-up monitoring, and information on proper tree care techniques. This is a great bargain! For more information, please visit www.friendsoftrees.org for our tree database and info about Friends of Trees.

We are gathering interest right now for the Vernon Tree Planting Event, so please contact Amy at 503-936-5340 or vernontrees@gmail.com to sign up to buy a tree, volunteer, donate funds or simply get involved with this great event!

Minutes of VNA for Aug

Madison announced there will be live music at landlapp restruant we need to do a good neighbor agreement with them.
Next land use meeting is Aug 17th at Enterbeing.
Ww are still waiting to receive application from 20th and Alberta development project. Issue is should the letter come from our committee or the VNA? Receiving application means the planner sends letter and we have 28 days to reply. VNA will receive the notification and people within 400 ft of the sight.
Merchant alliance had a visioning meeting and got $200.00 for participation and next meeting is the 21st of Aug. Suggestions have been made for the Xmas season.
Article in the Oregoneon and in response to Last Thursday Art was the largest turn out so far. A request was made that parking be removed on last Thursday and also to approach Tri-met during last Thursday.
Jerome made a presentation about an event at Alberta Park. Free food, music, fellowship and get to know one another. A prayer at the end about our neighborhood and city and hand out school project. To provide supplies for those who can’t afford to get their own. Let the community know we care and we are behind them and support our children. He would love to have our support in donation or school supplies. Tax ID number can be provided. If you would like to be there to help set up and make happen, he would love some volunteer. Aug 26, the last Saturday of the month from 1 to 5. Jefferson choir will be singing. Po Soul enertainment is providing the sound system. Cash donation would be made to Greater Solid Rock. Motion was made and seconded to give $75.00.
We need to take care of our own. Condo’s are going to outprice the issues of the poor and working class and we are asking Jerome to help us by representing or helping bring in people of color.
Michael VanDevater of Northwest Oregon Outreach Coordinator represented the BlueSky renewable energy. They provide the ability for us to sign up for 100% renewable energy. If someone in the VNA neighborhood signs up for this energy, $10.00 per person would go to the VNA. It is suggested that we include this information during our survey.
Lindy voices concern of the smallness of our group and how to bring in more diversity. How do we encourage churches to send representatives.
Gail suggests that we write each of the churches and non profits and asks for representative. Rob volunteers to draft a letter for this.
We need to prepare for the “walk-about” with Debbie.
Shoot for sometime in Sept to do the survey.
John suggest we have a liason with the Police Dept in general, including last Thursday. He will call Lance and see what can be arranged. John will report on this.
Lindy will try and get Willy Brown to come to the next meeting.

Alberta Street Fair

Just a reminder that our street fair is Scheduled for:

September 16th 2006.
11am-6pm

Do you have activities planned? We’ll include it in the program!
Deadline is 10 minutes before you receive this email.

If you haven’t received posters, let us know! We tried to reach everyone.

The parade is @ 2pm. Come join the parade!

And…….

We desperately need volunteers the day of the event. Please ask your friends, family and neighbors to help. A couple of hours gets you a whole lot of love.
Volunteers call: 503-997-9419

Please email info@albertastreetfair.com.

www.albertastreetfair.com

Land Use Committee Meeting minutes

7 pm, Wednesday, August 30, 2006

Attending: Oma Richmond, Lindy Cicada, Committee Chair John Fall, Katherine Krajnak, Dean, Jane Wilcox, Ron Stallinger, Gabe Dominek, B. Madison Ragland, Jen Dzienas, Kevin Valk, Mark Downing

Planning a response regarding the proposed 20th and Albert Condo Complex
John Fall, committee chair, said he spoke with planner Justin Dollard and the architect.

1. John received the letter of notification of the project on August 23rd.

2. From that date, we have 14 days to reply and then 45 days to meet with the developer.

3. Then, the developer is required to send a letter to the City, stating their response to comments made at the meeting. This can be anything from a decision to redesign based on neighborhood comments to a refusal to consider any changes.

4. After that letter is received at the City, the City issues a Public Notice to neighborhood associations, businesses and residents surrounding the property, and a 21-day Public Comment period begins.

John says that it is important to be visible throughout this process, that steps 1-3 above are important in that City will want to see if the neighborhoods and the developer are willing to participate in the process. Once steps 1-3 are completed, the public comment period is actually more important in determining how much influence we will have in the process.

Lindy Cicada, Vernon Neighborhood Assoc. President, said that she and George Bruender (Concordia), had met with Craig Fondren He lives on NE 20th just behind the Lagniappe Restaurant and is active in the Sabin Neighborhood Assoc. He believed that the land use committee should use the landmarks process to challenge the 20th and Alberta condo, that there were Landmarks Commission rulings that would help us. And he also said to “make a lot of noise”.

Kevin said that the landmarks commission reviews landmarks in historic districts, but he didn’t know that this was an historic district. The Mississippi neighborhood is, for instance. Dean remarked that Craig had always helped the neighborhood.

Preparing for the Meeting with the Developer

Katherine, a planning student at Portland State, recommended that we plan and produce two two-hour workshop/meetings on the aspects of building design in order to prepare community members to comment on various details of the proposed building and areas of change that could make it more acceptable to the neighborhood.

She thought that this way, a larger group/wider range of people would be able to come together, just once, to tell us what they regard as highest priorities for negotiating with the developer, based on a list of possible areas of change.

The committee agreed that one weeknight and one weekend workshop would make it accessible to a good number of people and fit within the schedule of meeting with the developer.

Katherine will plan and present the workshops. John Fall will try to secure a space. We need something larger than Enterbeing, we think.

John will try to schedule the meeting with the architect/developer for October 2nd or 3rd at 7 or 7:30. It was agreed that 12 people should attend that meeting, no more than four from each neighborhood association, that is, King, Vernon and Concordia.

To prepare for that, John will also try to secure spaces for the workshops. Target dates for the week night workshop would be September 21st or 27th (preferably the 21st). The weekend workshop would be Sept 16th or September 23rd (23rd is much preferred.)

Committee and neighborhood association members will deliver flyers (created by Katherine) in the neighborhoods. Katherine distributed a summary of the proposed workshops.

It was suggested that we could get facilitation help for the workshops from Judith Mowry at Resolutions NW. Katherine agreed to call her.

John will send the letter to the architect/developer tomorrow, that’s August 31st. He asked them for the following:
∑ Bring a staff member of Emerald Construction to the meeting
∑ Bring someone who represents the company, a decision-maker
∑ Also, we would like to see detailed drawings with materials samples and, if possible, 3-dimensional images of the building
∑ We would like to know their proposed construction time table
∑ Told them that, in the interim, we would be gathering community input

(Note: John Fall received a copy of the architect’s plans soon after this meeting. Contact him to find out how to review the plans.)

Gabe Dominek said that they have to come in good faith and that we need a lot more information.






Neighborhood Tour Update

The tour was postponed until Thursday, September 7th. Tour reps (Lindy, Katherine, Tara and Larry) will talk with them about what we do and don’t like about development in the area. They are trying to answer the question, “What’s good infill?” They will be looking at development around the intersection of 15th and Killingsworth. They will be talking about zoning issues, also issues in the King neighborhood.

Katherine plans to give the planners a memorandum. She will email the finished memorandum to committee members. She can be reached at katk@pdx.edu

The meeting adjourned at 8 pm and the next meeting was set for Wednesday September 13th in order to meet again before the workshops.

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

New City of Portland program provides $200,000 in Neighborhood Small Grants

Applications being accepted for Portland Neighborhood Small Grants through seven District Coalition offices

The City of Portland, Office of Neighborhood Involvement and seven district coalitions announce a new Neighborhood Small Grants Program with $200,000 available to neighborhood and community-based organizations. Proposals will be due no later than 4:00 PM, Wednesday, November 1, 2006.

More information can be found at www.portlandonline.com/oni

Goal of this grants program:
The grants program is intended to support neighborhood and community-based organizations as an opportunity to build their organizational capacity, attract new and diverse membership, and sustain those already involved in their organizations.

Specific criteria requirements listed at: http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=43121&

Projects are encouraged to:
• Establish partnerships amongst neighborhood associations and other under-represented community-based organizations;
• Provide opportunities for under-represented communities to become engaged in the neighborhood system; and
• Result in re-invigorating community participation and implementation activities associated with VisionPDX (the effort in which residents are invited to help envision Portland 20 years from now.)


Grants administered by seven district coalitions:
The grants program is being administered through the seven neighborhood district coalitions funded by the Office of Neighborhood Involvement. Applicants will need to choose a neighborhood district coalition to submit proposals to depending on whether the project benefits the residents residing within that coalition's geographical area. Each Coalition has been allocated a percentage of total funds based upon a formula that considers the number of neighborhood associations and relative income levels. Each District Coalition has been allocated the following amount. Each Coalition will have a grant-making committee made up of district coalition and/or neighborhood association, business community and under-represented community non-profit leaders. They may utilize up to a 15% fee to administer their grants:
• Central Northeast Coalition of Neighbors, $15,113
• East Portland Neighborhood Office, $37,724
• Northeast Coalition of Neighborhoods, $25,371
• North Portland Neighborhood Services, $22,149
• Neighbors West Northwest, $25,355
• Southeast Uplift Neighborhood Program, $49,148
• Southwest Neighborhoods, Inc., $25,140


How can I get an application form:
We encourage you to directly contact the district coalition you are interested in submitting an application to. All the applications will be posted on the ONI website. Several coalitions are still finalizing their application forms, which should be completed and posted on the ONI website by September 14.

http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=43131&

Contact information to reach each district coalition is listed below or at: http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=43124&

Deadline for proposals:
Proposals will be due no later than 4:00 PM, Wednesday, November 1, 2006 at the district coalition you apply to. Do not send proposals to the Office of Neighborhood Involvement!


Informational grant writing workshops offered:
Three free grant writing workshops for prospective applicants will be held to assist in answering questions about the application, the committee review process, use of funds and provide technical assistance for actual grant writing. Participation is optional. The workshops will be held:

September 14, 2006
6:30 PM to 9:00 PM
Southeast Uplift, 3534 SE Main, Fireside Meeting Room

September 20, 2006
6:30 PM to 9:00 PM
East Portland Neighborhood Office, 1017 NE 117th Ave.

September 28, 2006
6:30 PM to 9:00 PM
Portland Building, 1105 SW 5th Ave., 2nd Floor, Room B

Pre-registration is required for the workshops. Attendance is limited to one workshop per person.
Register online at www.portlandonline.com/oni (direct link http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=43130& )
or by calling Brian Hoop at 503-823-3075 or email bhoop@ci.portland.or.us. Don't forget to say which workshop you want to attend.

Workshops are wheelchair accessible. TTY: 503-823-6868.
If special assistance is required for language interpretation or child care please contact us seven days in advance.

Contact information for each neighborhood district coalition:

For further information on applying to a specific Coalition fund contact the District Coalition for which you intend to submit a proposal. Below is contact information for each district coalition, links to coalition maps, and neighborhoods served by each coalition. There are five unaffiliated neighborhoods that are assigned to a district coalition for the purposes of this grant program only.

Contact info at: http://www.portlandonline.com/oni/index.cfm?c=43124&

Central Northeast Neighbors
Sandra Lefrancois, Neighborhood Involvement Specialist
503-823-2780
cnnoutreach@teleport.com
4415 NE 87th Ave., Portland, OR 97220

Map of this coalition area at:
http://www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=60588

Includes the following neighborhoods:
Beaumont-Wilshire, Cully, Hollywood, Madison South, Rose City Park, Roseway, Sumner, and Sunderland


East Portland Neighborhood Office
Richard Bixby, Director
503-823-4550
rbixby@ci.portland.or.us
1017 NE 117th Ave., Portland, OR 97220

Map of this coalition area at:
http://www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=60589

Includes the following neighborhoods:
Argay, Centennial, Glenfair, Hazelwood, Lents, Mill Park, Parkrose, Parkrose Heights, Pleasant Valley, Russell, Wilkes, Woodland, Powellhurst-Gilbert


Neighbors West/Northwest
Mark Sieber, Director
503-823-4288
coalition@nwnw.org
2257 NW Raleigh, Portland, OR 97210

Map of this coalition area at:
http://www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=60591

Includes the following neighborhoods:
Arlington Heights, Forest Park, Goosehollow, Hillside, Linnton, Northwest District, Northwest Heights, Northwest Industrial, Pearl District, Sylvan-Highlands, Downtown, and Old Town/Chinatown


North Portland Neighborhood Services
Tom Griffin-Valade, Director
503-823-4524
npns@ci.portland.or.us
2209 N. Schofield, Portland, OR 97217

Map of this coalition area at:
http://www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=60592

Includes the following neighborhoods:
Arbor Lodge, Bridgeton, Portsmouth, East Columbia, Cathedral Park, Hayden Island, Kenton, Overlook, Piedmont, St. Johns, and University Park


Northeast Coalition of Neighborhoods
Willie Brown, Director
503-823-4575
Necn123@hotmail.com
4815 NE 7th Ave., Portland, OR 97211

Map of this coalition area at:
http://www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=60593

Includes the following neighborhoods:
Alameda, Boise, Concordia, Eliot, Grant Park, Humboldt, Irvington, King, Sabin, Sullivan's Gulch, Vernon, Woodlawn and Lloyd District


Southeast Uplift Neighborhood Program
Steve Hoyt, Policy and Strategy Coordinator
503-232-0010 x 321
Steve@southeastuplift.org
3534 SE Main, Portland, OR 97214

Map of this coalition area at:
http://www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=60594

Includes the following neighborhoods:
Ardenwald/Johnson Creek, Brentwood/Darlington, Brooklyn, Buckman, Center, Creston-Kenilworth, Eastmoreland, Foster-Powell, Hosford-Abernethy, Kerns, Laurelhurst, Montavilla, Mt. Tabor, Mt. Scott-Arleta, South Tabor, Reed, Richmond, Sellwood-Moreland, Sunnyside, and Woodstock


Southwest Neighborhoods, Inc.
Sylvia Bogert, Director
503-823-4592
Swni123@spiritone.com
7688 SW Capitol Highway, Portland, OR 97219

Map of this coalition area at:
http://www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=60595

Includes the following neighborhoods:
Arnold Creek, Ashcreek, Bridlemile, Collins View, Corbett-Terwilliger-Lair Hill, Crestwood, Far Southwest, Hayhurst, Hillsdale, Homestead, Maplewood, Markham, Marshall Park, Multnomah, South Burlingame, West Portland Park, Southwest Hills, and Healy Heights


Why this grant program was created:
The grants program responds to years of input from neighborhood and community leaders for increased direct resources to neighborhood associations and other community-based groups working on local neighborhood projects. City Council approved the funding as part of the Office of Neighborhood Involvement's fiscal year 2006-07 budget.

A PDF flier to distribute at your meetings or interested individuals can be found at:
http://www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=129569


Brian Hoop
Interim Manager
Neighborhood Resource Center
City of Portland, Office of Neighborhood Involvement
City Hall, 1221 SW 4th Ave., Room 110
Portland, OR 97204
Work: (503) 823-3075
Cell: (503) 793-5451
Fax: (503) 823-3050
TTY: (503) 823-6868
bhoop@ci.portland.or.us
www.portlandonline.com/oni
City of Portland Information & Referral: (503) 823-4000

Zoning questions answered by Debbie

Here are responses to your questions:

1. The EX zone has evolved since it was initiated in the Zoning Code. Historically, it's been applied to areas like NW Portland, where industrial/employment uses existed, to allow for a mix of uses in these areas. The Zoning Code's description of the EX zone is written in a way that someone could possibly interpret the zone the way the neighbor is doing. This section of Zoning Code likely needs updating given the fact that the regulations for the EX zone allow a wide variety of employment, commercial and residential uses without specific limiting regulations on uses (unless specifically crafted in a plan district for an area). And so, the mixed use project proposed for 20th and Alberta is allowed to happen based on the uses proposed. (Have I confused you?)

2. Alberta St. does not have a historic designation, either individually or as part of a historic or conservation district. Alberta is located between two designated local districts -- the Piedmont and the Mississippi Conservation Districts -- but is not part of either. One property on Alberta St. is designated as a historic landmark. It was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 1998. This property is at 2703 NE Alberta, formerly known as the Alberta Substation.

3. You are correct with your observation, the difficulty is in the implementation. There is a need to revisit the City's alley policies and procedures to facilitate more alley use. Currently, a developer would be responsible for improving the entire alleyway to City standards in order to use it, which can be very costly. The developer may choose to take the less expensive route and not use the alleyway. According to Bill, most alleys do not meet City standards.

I am putting together a power point presentation from the tours and will be sure to mention the alley issue in reference to the example you showed us in Concordia. Also, the NECN LUT Committee (and the CNN LUT Committee?) could develop a list of priorities to request the City pursue, this could be one of those items.

I hope these responses are helpful.

Debbie

Sunday, September 03, 2006

To: Subject: visionPDX Grants Celebration and Forum, October 14, 2006

From: "Hoop, Brian"
Date: September 1, 2006 1:09:25 PM PDT



To Neighborhood Association leaders


Save the date!

visionPDX Grants Celebration and Forum
Saturday, October 14, 2006
Grantee Lunch at 11:30; Public event 12:30 - 4:00 pm
East Portland Community Center

Join the visionPDX grant recipients to celebrate the close of the first phase of visionPDX and congratulate these incredible organizations on a job well done!

Learn about the dynamic outreach these organizations conducted this summer: the successes, the challenges, and the lessons learned as they spoke with thousands of Portlanders about their hopes and dreams for our city's future.

Enjoy refreshments and entertainment!
Meet some of the stars of visionPDX!
Learn about how local organizations are improving our community!

If interested in reserving a space now, email: plvision@ci.portland.or.us or call: 503.823.4430.

To review the funded organizations and their visionPDX projects, click here.

For a preview, learn about what the grantees have been up to in the first part of their projects by reviewing this document: http://www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=127680.

Child care and translation services available upon request.

Office of Mayor Tom Potter

Dear Portlander,
I know we all share a love for our city and excitement about the future of our community. Over the past
year, I’ve heard from many of you about the need to have a community-wide discussion about the values
we share, the challenges we face, and the decisions we all need to make to create the city we want for the
future. Hundreds of citizens have already shared common concerns with me, volunteered to improve our
community, and conveyed stories of Portland at its best.
Now it’s time to get started – to engage our community to create a shared vision for Portland’s future, 30
years from now and beyond. This vision will be the basis of strategic plans for the city government and
all the other individuals and organizations that share responsibility for shaping our community.
I’m happy to announce the first phase of the Portland Community Vision project. Over the next couple of
months, the project will be gearing up with staff, the composition of a volunteer Community Vision
Committee, and initial outreach and engagement activities to spur our discussion: What do we want our
city to be 30 years from now? What kind of legacy do we want to leave our children and grandchildren?
What roles and responsibilities do each of us have in solving community problems and creating an
intentional future? I believe that all the citizens of Portland need to answer these questions together, and
then work together to make that vision a sustainable future.
I encourage you, your friends, neighbors, and coworkers to get involved with the Community Vision
project. Spread the word, and encourage people you know to consider serving on the Vision Committee
to help steer the project. Over the next year or more, there will be many opportunities for citizens,
businesses, organizations and neighborhoods to take part in conversations, host events, create solutions,
and have fun.
This is just the start! Please stay tuned to my website (www.portlandonline.com/mayor) and other
community organizations and news sources in the coming months for opportunities to get involved in
shaping Portland’s future. If you’d like to receive updates about the project and these opportunities,
please send an email with your contact info to: plvision@ci.portland.or.us or call 503-823-7838. I know
there are already many community efforts underway to bring neighbors together and to tackle tough
problems, so let us know of ways we can link events and opportunities.
I know I can count on you to share your ideas, spread the word, and lend a hand. Let’s roll up our sleeves
and build the future!
Tom Potter
Mayor

Subject: King and Vernon Neighborhoods' Tour - September 7

Hello All,

Neighborhood tours continue next week with a neighborhoods' led tour of the King and Vernon neighborhoods. You are welcome to join Bill Cunningham, fellow planner and I, and King and Vernon neighborhood representatives, to learn more about good and bad redevelopment and issues and special places in these neighborhoods. We will be meeting on Thursday, September 7, at 6:00 PM sharp, at the parking lot at the southeast corner of Sumner and Garfield (one block west of MLK, one block north of Alberta). This is the site of the VanPort Square project.

Carpool transportation will be available. Hope to see you then.
Enjoy the holiday weekend!
Debbie

Debbie Bischoff, Senior Planner
Portland Bureau of Planning
1900 S.W. 4th Avenue, Suite 4100
Portland, OR 97201-5350
(503) 823-6946 -phone
(503) 823-7800 - fax
dbischoff@ci.portland.or.us

Subject: 20th/Alberta Condos -- Current Architectural Plans

All:

The architectural plans for the NE 20th/Alberta condos arrived today. They include listing/photos of exterior materials.

We will be using the plans in the community workshop in September to learn what community members think of this specific development and development on Alberta in general.

(More on that when we have firm dates and a location. We will need everyone's help getting the word out regarding the workshops.)

To avoid losing track of them before the workshop, I will keep the plans here. If you want to look at the plans before the workshop, there are several ways to do so.

1) Drop by tomorrow, Friday September 1 between 5pm and 8pm. 4823 NE 20th. I'll be here specifically to give people an opportunity to look them over.

2) Call me any time between the hours of 9am and 7pm on any day to set up a time to come by and see the plans. 503-310-8264

3) Copies will be given to the King and Concordia land use committees.

4) Come to the next Land Use Committee meeting in two weeks at 7pm on September 13. 4823 NE 20th.

Thanks.

John Fall
Vernon Neighborhood Association Land Use Chair

Draft letter to Design Review

August 7, 2006
In response to: LUR Application # 06-118229

(This Letter was written prior to receiving a copy of the Design Review / LUR Application and will be revised to include specific comments or concerns and changes from what we have previously seen for this project that come up after reviewing the application. This letter is intended as a draft for review by the Vernon and Concordia Neighborhood Associations and is not intended for distribution to the City of Portland at this time. All content that may require editing after the Application is received is in italics)

Jean Hester, Senior City Planner
1900 SW First Ave. Suite 5000
Portland, OR. 97201

Dear Jean Hester,

We at the Vernon and Concordia Neighborhood Associations have received a copy of the Design Review Application for the proposed development at NE 20th and Alberta and have several comments and concerns regarding this proposal.
Our neighborhoods have been collaborating the since receiving the Pre-Application Notice and Summary Reports and have been discussing concerns voiced by local residents after a presentation from the architect. The site is a vacant lot with several complaints filed against it. We are delighted to see that the community has become a vibrant place enough to support some of the infill development boom that has reached many of our adjacent communities. However, we were very surprised by the height limits allowed by the zone and the resulting massing taking full advantage of this. Many neighbors have also expressed their concerns regarding existing parking issues and the added demand created by 59 new living units. The overall value of the project and materials selection also has many of us concerned.
Our largest and neighbor’s most voiced concern is regarding the height of the proposed development. The zoning on the site is Ex, with d and h overlays. For this type of mixed-use residential development, a 65’ maximum height is allowed per the zoning code. We feel that the proposed development is taking advantage of this height limit to max-out the buildable area on the site without meeting the regulations set forth in the Zoning Code.
In Zoning Code Section 33.140.030, the characteristics of the Central Employment (Ex) zone are described as: “The intent of the zone is to allow industrial and commercial uses which need a central location…Residential uses are allowed, but are not intended to predominate or set development standards…The development standards are intended to allow new development which is similar in character to existing development.” The proposed development is primarily residential with a few commercial spaces on Alberta. The language of the zoning code suggests that the zone is intended to create centrally located employment opportunities encouraging mixed-use with wider height and FAR allowances. With only three ground floor retail type spaces proposed, this development does not quite meet the standards set forth by the zoning code and does not provide enough of a mixed-use allowing for more jobs at this location.
The final sentence of the aforementioned Zoning Code Section raises even more, varied and somewhat subjective concerns from the neighborhood about the development and height of the proposal. There are no developments along Alberta, or the adjacent communities, that are of similar height or character of the proposed development. The height of the adjacent commercial spaces and homes range from 15’-30’. There is a couple of existing and recently developed four story buildings within a few blocks. Given the 3:1 FAR, adjustments to the massing of the proposal can achieve a lower height without losing the desired density of the development and getting closer to the existing development character.

The building as proposed does not do enough to break down the height and massing along the adjacent residential edge and does not meet Alberta Street in the same manner as existing developments. There has been a lot of effort made by the architect to respond to the existing residential fabric with porch like elements and pitched roofs along 20th Ave. However, this vocabulary wraps the corner onto Alberta and does not pick up the existing character of buildings on this street. Several of the structures along Alberta are one and two story commercial buildings, with storefront at the ground floor. All of these buildings meet the street with a wall extending the length of the property line, emphasizing the main street nature and commerce of the corridor. Recently constructed buildings to the east have met the property line with similar character quite successfully. The plans and elevations indicate a large hole in the Alberta St. façade, to an internal courtyard. This breaks the line and character of the street without adding much for the community. The scaling and massing effort would better be suited to the North where a 65’ wall is currently only 20’ away from the property line, shadowing existing houses and yards of a much smaller scale.
This community faces several challenges with parking even though Alberta is a transit street. The number of residential units proposed demands on site parking as not to burden the adjacent businesses and residents. (This paragraph to be completed after reviewing the application. If they are providing parking, great, we’ll commend them for their efforts; if not we’ll explain our current hardships and demand that they provide parking for a minimum number of residents)
The materials proposed and sustainable efforts to date are vague. As a community, we support sustainable efforts and appreciate the development is taking this direction. The existing buildings on the street are varied in their materials. Some of the newer buildings on Alberta have chosen similar palettes to one another. We would like to emphasize the need to set forth new standards of quality with each development and encourage choices that are in harmony with the existing contextual materials…(More space for comments and concerns regarding the materials proposed and if they even mention anything about their sustainable choices. There is an awfully large amount of impervious courtyard and roof area proposed on a site that is currently doing a good job of managing it’s own storm water. I am interested to see how they are resolving this. Storm water tanks, low greenroof-Could be nice on the residential edge, etc.)
In conclusion, we have several concerns about the resulting impact of this proposed development on our community. Our concerns regarding the overall height, opportunities and character of the proposal are not in response or disproval of infill development along Alberta, but are rooted in the intent of the Ex zoning designation for this site, and are validated in the code description for the Central Employment classification. Difficulties with the massing, failing efforts to step down enough to the adjacent residential properties and how the building lacks to meet Alberta with the same dignity the existing building on the street, raises further concerns that the development is maxing out it’s buildable envelope without questioning whether it really works within the context and character of the neighborhood.

Sincerely,


Vernon and Concordia Neighborhood Associations


CC: Justin Fallon Dollard, planner



JD

Draft of Aug 2006 Alberta Business Report

ALBERTA BUSINESS AND ORGANIZATION REPORT



Final Report
August 21, 2006






















Daniel Monroe Sullivan
Department of Sociology
Portland State University




Copyright, Daniel Monroe Sullivan
All rights reserved
INTRODUCTION

The Alberta neighborhood has been undergoing a lot of changes in recent years. Some people refer to these changes as “revitalization,” while others call it “gentrification.” Whichever term is used, it is clear that many of the newer residents have more education and higher incomes, resulting in an increase in homeownership and home renovations, and a decline in abandoned houses and vacant lots (see Table 1). There also has been a marked decrease in crime and an increase in businesses opening on Alberta Street, with some now referring to the neighborhood as the “Alberta Arts District.” There has also been a dramatic rise in housing prices and rent, making the neighborhood decidedly less affordable. This has put an economic strain on some residents, some of whom have been forced out the neighborhood. In addition, there has been a drop in African American residents and an increase in whites and Latinos. With all of these changes taking place, the goals of this survey are to see how current businesses and organizations feel about the changes that have taken place on Alberta Street and how they would like it to change in the future.

During May of 2005, 11 students from Portland State University interviewed 88 businesses and organizations (including churches) on Alberta Street. Interviewers attempted many times to make contact in order to insure that our sample was representative of the neighborhood. Of those contacted, the response rate was 92%.

Table 1: Demographic Changes in the Alberta Neighborhood, 1900-20001
1990 2000
Owner-occupied housing units (%) 41 52
Rental housing units (%) 47 43
Vacant housing units (%) 12 6
Median house price $49,1362 $133,585
Median rent $5612 $679
Poverty rate (%) 31 15
Median Household Income $25,9052 $37,918
High school degree or higher (%) 75 74
College degree or higher (%) 11 30
African American (%) 44 25%3
White, non-Latino (%) 46 51
Latino (%) 3 8
Other race (%) 8 15
1: Neighborhood boundaries are formed by NE Killingsworth, NE 33rd, NE Prescott, and NE 15th.
2: Adjusted for inflation. In 2000 dollars.
3: A multi-racial category was added to the 2000 census. It is very likely that some who identified as African American in 1990 changed their identification to multi-racial in 2000. Therefore, the 19 percentage point drop in African Americans from 1990 to 2000 probably exaggerates the actual decline in African Americans.
OPINIONS ABOUT ALBERTA STREET

The majority of respondents feel that Alberta Street is a good (52%) or excellent (24%) place to operate their business or organization. Twenty-one percent rate it as “fair”, while the remaining 3% rate it as “poor.” Not surprisingly, those who feel vulnerable to displacement are less likely to evaluate the street positively. Eighty-four percent of those who do not feel vulnerable to displacement rate the street as “excellent” or “good”, but only 67% of those who feel somewhat vulnerable to displacement and 43% of those who feel very vulnerable.

In evaluating changes to the street over that past five years, an overwhelming majority (83%) feel that, overall, it has gotten better, while 13% feel it has stayed about the same and 4% feel it has gotten worse. By far the most common positive change cited is growth on Alberta Street. Two-thirds of respondents said that they liked the fact that there are more businesses, more
renovations and new buildings and that, overall, there are more people living in the neighborhood and more customers visiting Alberta Street.

One respondent illustrates the view that more businesses on Alberta Street attract more customers to the neighborhood, which end up benefiting all businesses.

“As a business owner…definitely more shops are better for my business. The more shops that open up, everybody’s going to have their own draw and…everybody’s else’s customers, they’re going to find the other shops that are nearby it. So more can only be better for business” (White retail owner, less than five years).

The second most common positive change, cited by 16% of respondents, is increased safety and declining crime. One longtime business owner discusses how he feels safer walking on Alberta Street nowadays:

“Well, it’s gotten considerably better…[I]t’s cleaned up and a lot more what I call ‘friendly faces’ walking up and down the street. And of course 5, 10 years ago, you’d see gangsters walking up and down the street. Now it’s kind of the purple spiky, spiky kind of hair...You get a gang of Black kids walking up and down the street you weren’t sure how many of them were packing some sort of weapon. I’ve basically been told you want to stay away from them because…there’s no predicting what’s going to happen” (White owner of personal services business, more than ten years).

Another business owner feels that the neighborhood’s reputation has changed, and that it is seen as safer now. She recounts how her friends from outside the neighborhood used to react to her living in the neighborhood:

“I moved here from…bigger and more troubled cities and so when I got here I didn’t think too much about living in this neighborhood. But when I had jobs with people from outside the neighborhood…they asked me where I lived. They were like ‘Really, you live up there?’…[I]t’s really changed. They were concerned…to live up there; and I never really saw it as such, but I got that reaction a lot.
She states that even the police were surprised that she lived in the neighborhood:

“I used to get pulled over in my car by the police, and I worked in clubs…so I’d be coming home at 2:30, 3 o’clock in the morning and I’d get pulled over by the police and I’d swear the only reason was because I was White. They were wondering what I was doing over here back then.…[I]t has changed so much, …you used to hear gunshots everyday, every night” (White retail owner, less than five years).

Although most respondents feel that most of the neighborhood changes have been positive, some respondents noted two changes that they have not liked. Fifteen percent state that they do not like the increasing rent. Fifteen percent also do not like the declining diversity. Some express their dislike for this decline by saying that most of the new businesses are white-owned, and others expressed it by saying that they do not like the fact that there are fewer longtime, minority-owned businesses.

In addition to using their own words to describe what they like and dislike about Alberta Street,
Table 2 (on the next page) illustrates respondents’ evaluations of common problems found on commercial streets. By far the biggest problem cited was vandalism and graffiti: 90% said it is a problem (with 42% stating it is a serious problem). Trash in the streets and burglaries/thefts are the next two most commonly cited (80% and 68%). Gangs and police not caring are the two least cited (35% each). Given that the area around Alberta Street is racially and socio-economically mixed, it is important to determine if tension between different groups is a problem. Just about half of the respondents feel they are problems, with most of them classifying them as minor problems.

One artist describes the tension between different groups on Alberta Street as a result of economic forces that he believes no one can control:

“[T]he neighborhood actually racially and ethnically gets along pretty well. …[T]he only tension is a political one; …[A]s the neighborhood is becoming more upscale, more college educated...those on the lower end are definitely feeling the pressure and they’re basically being pushed out of the neighborhood. And as much as…many of us here would love to keep the multicultural element as much as possible, but unfortunately what determines that is outside our control. It’s controlled by economic forces, not by social or political forces. Unless we all decided to get together and pool money to support…the lower-income groups that live here, which is not feasible. That’s the only way it could be done” (White artist, less than five years).

He goes on to state that he considers the tension between the economic groups as minor:

“Minor…and it’s outside of everybody’s control anyway... I mean theoretically if all the businesses that are causing the political problems that those in the neighborhood find it to be so...poofed out (disappeared), their lives would actually go down. And that’s the sad

Table 2: Opinions about Neighborhood Problems (%)
Serious Minor
Problem Problem No Problem Undecided
Vandalism and graffiti 42.0 47.7 9.1 1.1
Not enough affordable space 33.0 27.3 27.3 12.5
Trash in the streets 22.7 56.8 20.5 0.0
Drug dealing 20.5 37.5 29.5 12.5
Tension – economic groups 18.2 36.4 39.8 5.6
Tension – racial/ethnic groups 14.8 35.2 47.7 2.3
Burglaries and thefts 12.5 54.5 20.5 12.5
Loud noises 11.4 45.5 43.2 0.0
Police not caring 9.1 25.0 52.3 13.6
Organized gangs 8.0 27.3 48.9 15.9
Assaults and muggings 8.0 31.8 45.5 14.8
Not maintaining appearance 4.5 46.6 46.6 2.3

fact; they’d have less businesses to go to, the neighborhood wouldn’t be as appealing, their own property value would go under, it would decrease. I mean it’s...all things in life that way have a possible negative aspect to them, and this is just as true of neighborhoods.”

With rent increasing for many businesses on Alberta Street, it is also important to note if affordability is a problem. When asked if the lack of affordability is a problem for Alberta businesses and organizations, 60% believe it is (33% = serious problem, 27% = minor problem). However, in terms of their own situation, only 8% feel very vulnerable to displacement and another 18% feel somewhat vulnerable.

Race and type of business are the two most important factors in understanding respondents’ opinions. In terms of race, Black respondents tend to believe that there are more problems on Alberta Street than do Whites, Latinos, multiracial, and other races. For example, sixty-four percent of Black respondents state that “police not caring” is a problem, as opposed to only 28% of other respondents (see Table A in Appendix D). In terms of tension between different racial or ethnic groups, 79% of Black respondents perceive it as a problem, compared with only 45% of respondents of other races.

The racial characteristics of the clientele produce significant differences in opinions about two problems. Seventy-nine percent of businesses with a mostly Black clientele cite “police not caring” as a problem (as opposed to only 27% of businesses with a mostly White clientele and 29% of businesses with a mixed clientele). Eighty-nine percent of businesses with a mostly Black clientele list “tension between different racial or ethnic groups” as a problem (as opposed to only 47% of businesses with a mostly White clientele and 35% of businesses with a mixed clientele).

In terms of business/organization type, those who operate nonprofit organizations perceive more problems on Alberta Street than do for-profit businesses (see Table B in Appendix D). But if you look at Table C in Appendix D, you will note that the big difference is between Black nonprofit respondents and all other respondents (i.e., Black business respondents and all non-Black respondents). They are especially likely to cite these problems more: drug dealing, organized gangs, assault and muggings, loud noise, racial tension, police not caring, and not enough affordable space for businesses and organizations.

ART AND ALBERTA STREET

Sixty-nine percent of all surveyed businesses engage in some form of artistic expression. Besides Last Thursday (discussed in the next section), over half of all business exhibit art (59%) and nearly half sell art (49%). Nearly one-third (31%) produce art themselves, while 32% advertise artists and galleries. Finally, 25% engage in an artistic endeavor that defies simple categorization, including supporting art organizations financially, encouraging children to engage in art, practicing art therapy, arranging an art show of their staff’s work, providing space for a community mural, operating a bike art program, creating an “anarchic garden area,” and refinishing statues for a grotto.

“Alberta Arts”
The term “Alberta Arts,” which allegedly was created by a real estate agent about five or six years ago, is used widely by businesses, real estate agents, and the Art on Alberta organization (including the walking map they created). Given its wide use, what do people thing of this term? Half of the respondents say that it is an accurate term, while 27 percent say it is not accurate (another 23 percent did not state whether or not it is an accurate term). For those who feel it is an inaccurate term, some claim that Alberta Street is more than just art, while others say that there is simply not enough art on the street to be considered an arts district.

In addition to discussing whether “Alberta Arts” is an accurate term, some respondents also express either strong positive or negative reaction to it. In particular, 27% of respondents felt positively about the term. One respondent quips that, “It’s better than being called the Alberta Ghetto” (white owner of personal services business, less than five years). Although only ten percent react negatively, they are very emphatic about why they do not like it:

“I call this Alberta Street. I think some people like to be, I don’t know if the word’s ‘pretentious’ or not, but they can call it anything they want. Hopefully it stays ‘Alberta Street’” (White restaurant owner, five to ten years).

“I disagree (with this term); actually I strongly disagree. I don’t think it has anything to do with art” (Black nonprofit manager, more than ten years).

“…Just because there is a few art galleries down here… and it used to be low rent so… artists would live here and now its an art district so everything is hiked in price and the street itself can’t support the name” (White retail owner, less than five years).

One artist states emphatically that artists helped created the art scene in the “Alberta Arts” district, but they are not the ones benefiting from it.

“Very few of the artists that were original[ly] here have been able to reap the benefits of this ‘Alberta Arts District’ or ‘Alberta Renaissance’ simply because we don’t have a stake in it. We’re not property owners, we usually have leases and rents…We’re like the Marines… [T]his was a bad neighborhood. I was dodging bullets. It was really dicey… So…the artists go in like the Marines and have to secure the beachhead and then its like, ‘Okay, come in.’ And the yuppies come in and the espresso joint and the sushi and this and that. And the price point goes up, the artists have to…pick up their rucksack and go on to the next beachhead” (White artist, five to ten years).

Last Thursday
Last Thursday is a monthly art event that has grown from a small event started by a few gallery owners in 1997 to one that now involves a multitude of business, organizations, and street vendors and that attracts visitors from all over the city and beyond. Not only do art galleries and studios participate, but so do many nonprofits, retail shops, restaurants, bars, and coffee houses. In addition, the sidewalks are filled with art and food vendors, as well as musicians. Events at the playful and raucous Clown House include live music, mud wrestling, hula hooping, and “bike jousting.”

Of our respondents, 81% are open during Last Thursday and 62% do something special for it. As you would expect, art galleries have lots of activities on Last Thursday: new artist openings, live music, and wine and cheese offerings. In addition, many businesses and organizations that are not galleries do special activities on Last Thursday, including sponsoring magicians and coloring for kids, fund raising (for children’s sports teams, tsunami and Katrina victims), story tellers, slide shows, fashion shows, drum circles, and body painting. Businesses and organizations also use Last Thursday as an opportunity to advertise their products and services, either with a sidewalk table with brochures or an open house. Some businesses and organizations also sell things on the sidewalk that they do not normally sell inside: sno cones, popcorn, and other concessions.

Two-thirds of survey respondents view Last Thursday positively, 17% negatively, and 11% are ambivalent. The remaining 6% have no positive or negative opinions (see Table E in the appendix). Table 3 indicates that race seems to be the biggest determinant of respondents’ opinions: black respondents are half as likely to view Last Thursday positively as are Whites, Latinos, or those in other racial groups (36% vs. 72%, respectively). Similarly, respondents with


Table 3: Respondents Who Rate Last Thursday Positively, by Various Characteristics (%)1
All Respondents 65.9
Race of respondent**
African American 35.7
Other race 71.6
Race of clientele*
Mostly African American 22.2
Mixed 70.6
Mostly White 65.3
Years operating in neighborhood
<1 57.1
1-3 75.0
3-5 60.0
5-10 73.7
10-20 75.0
20+ 37.5
Ownership status*
Owner 47.6
Renter 70.8
Concern about displacement
Not concerned 67.7
Somewhat concerned 66.7
Very concerned 42.9
1: Respondents who have completely positive or mostly positive opinions of Last Thursday.
Note: Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (**p < .01, *p < .05).

mostly black clientele are much less likely to like it than those with a mixed clientele or a predominantly white clientele (22%, 71%, and 65%, respectively). Another important factor is ownership status: renters are more likely than are owners to view Last Thursday positively. Two other noticeable trends is that those who have operated in the neighborhood for more than 20 years and those who are very concerned about displacement are less likely to view Last Thursday positively.

Table 4 illustrates that a large majority of respondents believe that Last Thursday is (a) good for their business (88.2% agree or strongly agree), (b) good for businesses on Alberta Street (98.2%), and (c) good for the neighborhood (89.9%). Race and type of business are the most important factors in understanding respondents’ opinions (see Table F in appendix). Black respondents, in contrast to whites, Latinos, multiracial, and other race, tend to rate Last Thursday’s influence less positively. Similarly, those with predominantly black clientele are much less likely to view Last Thursday’s influence positively than those with mixed clientele or

Table 4: Last Thursday’s Influence (%)
Last Thursday is good for my business.
Strongly agree 40.0
Agree 41.2
Disagree 14.2
Strongly disagree 4.7
Last Thursday is good for businesses on Alberta Street.
Strongly agree 54.8
Agree 44.0
Disagree 1.2
Strongly disagree 0.0
Last Thursday is good for the neighborhood.
Strongly agree 45.6
Agree 44.3
Disagree 8.9
Strongly disagree 1.3

predominantly white clientele. Nonprofit organizations, industrial businesses, and those with a non-local client base are the least likely to view Last Thursday’s influence positively. In contrast, those who own restaurants, bars, and art galleries are the most likely to view Last Thursday’s influence positively. All other possible explanations (e.g., length of time operating on Alberta St., owners vs. renters, art vs. non-art businesses) are not significant.

Specific reasons for liking Last Thursday. There are three main reasons why respondents like Last Thursday. First, 32% say that that the neighborhood has improved dramatically and they are proud of what they have accomplished with the Alberta Arts district. Second, the same amount of respondents (32%) feels it is good for Alberta businesses, both in terms of increased sales on Last Thursday and, more generally, increasing Portlanders exposure to Alberta Street. The belief is that Last Thursday helps make Alberta Street a destination place for people who do not live in the neighborhood.

“I think it’s great to see so much life out on the street. It’s great for the businesses… Most of the shops on the street here are foot traffic based. So, when we have an event like Last Thursday or the street fair…it fills the street with traffic. That’s wonderful” (White retail owner, less than five years).

“I think it’s great for business,…it really…promotes this area, a lot of people come in from different areas on Last Thursdays” (White retail manager, less than five years).

The third main reason why they like Last Thursday is that it creates a fun, festive atmosphere (30%).

“I just love the kind of…lawlessness about it. People just do whatever they want really. …We’ll put beer and wine out and…we don’t have a license to do that but we don’t care… I have experienced some really kooky stuff, just randomly…whether it be a parade or…really neat art. I just like that about it, it’s kind of unexpected and free-going” (White retail owner, less than five years).

“It’s positive, anything that creates an active street life, a great pedestrian-oriented atmosphere, anything that gets creative activity out in the open and out in the public realm is a positive thing. I would like to see it stay funky, street level, unregulated” (White artist, five to ten years).

Specific reasons for not liking Last Thursday. Despite the majority of respondents having a positive opinion of Last Thursday, there are those who do not like it. The number one reason for not liking it is that it is too crowded, both in terms of the sidewalks and parking (22%). [A few suggested that Alberta Street should be closed to cars on Last Thursday.] Second, some do not like the atmosphere on Last Thursday (11%). Most who do not like the street atmosphere on Last Thursday are African American.

“Last Thursday is generally X-rated, or R-rated…it’s not a family thing. It’s not conducive for family… (Y)ou have people burning themselves, upside down, freak shows or…shock events…very liberal, new age” (Black nonprofit manager ).

“…now I feel like (Last Thursday) was pretty fun, it was kind of cool. This year, it’s not fun for me. (Now there is) the drunkenness, and the filth.…[W]hen it first started it was nice, it was family oriented. It was just fun for the family to get out and not be cooped-up in the hot sweaty house in the summer... Everyone would get out, and it was OK for kids… I understand diversity, and I celebrate diversity, but I think people misuse and abuse what diversity is and they just use it as an excuse to be outlandish and obnoxious… I don’t have to celebrate you walking down the street in a net shirt with no bra on and you’re a female, I don’t have to celebrate that… I know what diversity is, and that is not it…public nudity is not diversity” (Black nonprofit manager).

“People who’ve been around, they don’t really like [Last Thursday]” (Black nonprofit manager).

“It is more for the artsy person. I don’t see African Americans really participating, I don’t think a lot of the items and events are tailored for African Americans” (Black nonprofit manager).

Although most who do not like Last Thursday are African American, there were a few white respondents who also do not like it.

“I hate [Last Thursday]… [T]hese people don’t live in the neighborhood; they just come down to see what the freaks are up to and they drink the free wine and…they generally don’t return” (White retail owner, less than five years).

Finally, some business owners (8%) resent the presence of sidewalk vendors, claiming that they take business away from the galleries and stores.

“It’s in need of some organization because there’s a lot of street vendors and I think it’s kind of lost its upscale flavor. It seems as if there’s just an overwhelming amount of street vendors that are almost competing with the galleries. …It started off as…a way for the people to come see the art in the galleries and now it’s almost as if the galleries get lost in the shuffle and it’s all about the street vendors” (White coffeehouse owner, less than five years).

“Its just a little too funky right now, I mean I can appreciate all the street vendors but…I think the large majority isn’t good quality” (White restaurant owner, less than five years).

ENVISIONING ALBERTA STREET’S FUTURE

Most respondents (86%) are optimistic that Alberta Street will get better during the next five years. Only eight percent feel it will stay about the same and six percent feel it will get worse. To get a clearer idea of what respondents would like Alberta Street to become, we asked what aspects of Alberta Street they would like to stay the same as now and what changes they would like to see.

Stay the same. Respondents state many things that they would like to stay the same as now. However, there are three popular responses. Twenty-seven percent state that they would like the current vibe of Alberta Street to remain the same. Although using different words, many like the casualness, friendliness, and artistic feel to the neighborhood. A number of respondents explicitly state that they do not want Alberta Street to become like the more upscale and regulated Pearl District.

“I’d like it to not get too yuppie. I like the fact that our clientele is a mix of punk rocker types and…more middle class families with children” (White retail manager, less than five years).

“I would love to have Alberta…hold on to that originality and just keep it really… interesting and unique, and…lots of cool art everywhere and just kind of more like an adventure…when you came here, instead of just like your generic…shop” (White retail owner, less than five years).

“I would like the…village feel, the vital pedestrian orientation, as opposed to an…automotive thing… The cast of characters…there’s a lot of characters on the street. I’d like to see them…the eccentricities and the…individualities be a part of it and not be washed away like the Pearl District” (White artist, five to ten years).

Some respondents (23%) also want only small, independent businesses on Alberta Street. They are very adamant that they do not want large companies or chain stores.

“There really is no big business on this street, it’s nice, small, little businesses. We’re all…grassroots people that are just…doing what we can to make Alberta Street into a place that people would want to come to” (White retail owner, less than five years).

Twenty-two percent say that they want the street and the neighborhood to retain its diversity, with some stating specifically that they would like longtime and minority-owned businesses to remain on Alberta Street.

“In an ideal world I would like to see the loans made available to the minorities who live here, so that we can develop some things according to our life as well, and not have to conform to the ‘Hawthorne lifestyle’… We need a spot somewhere in here too…where it could cater to…those of color” (Black nonprofit manager).

“You see a lot of Caucasian white people and families moving into this area...I like to see livelihood on Alberta regardless of what race but I think that the African American community should not be forgotten about and a lot of things should be tailored to them and fit their culture and livelihood and lifestyles” (Black nonprofit manager).

“Well it’s changed mainly from minorities to a white community. If it were up to me, really I’d like it to stay the way it was. I like it to be for the people who live on the street and been here for a number of years, that they’d be able to stay here” (Black nonprofit manager).

“In an ideal world, I would like to see more…diverse stakeholders in the community and that would mean more minority-owned and operated businesses and buildings… I would like to see more of the creative types that made Alberta special in the way that it is, able to actually own and operate on Alberta… I would like to see more of the people who actually own the properties invest into the vitality of the neighborhood and not just take from it” (White artist, five to ten years).

“I…hope to see more stores that do meet the needs of the people who have lived here for a long time so that they don’t feel like their neighborhood is being taken over” (White retail owner, less than five years).

Ideal changes. Respondents also have many ideas of changes they would like to see, including rent control, having more artists/artists-owned businesses, more diversity, and added parking. However, the most common change respondents would like to see is more development (25%): more businesses, customers and renovated buildings, and fewer vacant lots and buildings.

“In an ideal world…[I would like] the growth to continue…and all the abandoned buildings continue to be developed into something where it looks…pleasant, and it can benefit the community” (Black nonprofit manager).

The only other suggestion for change on which some respondents agree is greater community (19%). For some, this means that in general they want a greater sense of community among businesses. For others, it specifically means that they want more business owners to live in and be a part of the neighborhood. For yet others it means that they want more community-oriented services such as social service agencies and community centers.

CONCLUSION

The goal of this study is to take a snap shot of the opinions of businesses and organizations on Alberta Street at one point in time. I have no agenda of either trying to be a cheerleader for or a critic of the changes taking place. I (and my students) simply asked everyone who was willing to participate a series of neutral questions and encouraged participants to be honest in their responses by assuring them confidentiality. I would argue that it is valuable to understand how others on the street feel, especially those with whom you may have limited or no contact. It is a way to begin dialogue.

So what are the main findings? One of them surely is that the majority like many of the changes taking place on the street. Very few respondents like all of the changes, but most participants like the majority of changes and are optimistic that the street will continue to improve. A second finding is that, to the extent that there is disagreement in opinion about Alberta Street, this disagreement falls along racial lines. Not social class. Not gender. Not the number of years operating on Alberta Street. Not whether one’s business or organization is related to art. The main factor that explains differences in opinion is race. Specifically, African American respondents and businesses/organizations whose clientele is largely African American are much less happy with how Alberta Street is changing. What is curious about this finding is (?) that many white respondents embrace the idea of diversity very strongly and (in my opinion) genuinely. There is a general sense that the neighborhood is losing its diversity, especially longtime African American businesses and organizations, and that there is nothing that can be done about it. Some white respondents also lament the fact that few of their clientele are African American.

Is there something that can be done to preserve or even enhance the racial diversity on Alberta Street? I offer a few suggestions below, but I imagine a frank discussion among all relevant (?) parties would produce more insightful steps to be taken. In terms of attracting clientele that better reflects the racial composition of the neighborhood, there are a few obvious steps that could be taken: hire a racially diverse staff from the neighborhood, offer products and prices that are attractive to a range of neighborhood residents, and advertise in diverse venues. Another, perhaps less obvious, suggestion concerns dogs. Although there are some residents and customers who are completely comfortable with dogs, there are others who are less comfortable with or even intimidated by them (even if the dogs are “well-behaved”). Dogs that are tied to poles on sidewalks outside of stores make it impossible for people to walk by or enter a business without making contact with these dogs. Dogs that are inside businesses or in adjacent patios make these places very unwelcoming to some.

The task of preserving or increasing African American businesses and organizations on Alberta Street is even more challenging. There are a few simple steps that can be taken: support local African American organizations and patronize local African American businesses. But other steps may not be so easy. Studies of racially stable neighborhoods in other cities have found that stable racial diversity does not happen naturally. Normally there has to be one or more neighborhood organizations that explicitly promote diversity as one of their main goals. Are there organizations on Alberta Street that promote diverse businesses? If so, do all or most businesses on the street support these organizations? Does the city government (and the Portland Development Commission) support these organizations?

Alberta Street is fascinating, multi-faceted and unique, and it is changing rapidly. Five years from now it will be quite different from the way it is now. I do not know how it will look then, but it will be different. The question is, Will there be much racial diversity left in five years? Is the answer to this question (whatever the answer may be) a forgone conclusion, or can businesses and organizations on Alberta Street have an influence on its outcome? I do not know the answers to these questions, but I think they are questions worth discussing.





The author would like to thank the Portland State University students in the Sociology Master=s Program for their assistance and all of the Alberta businesses and organizations that participated in the study.

Questions or comments can be sent to:

Daniel Sullivan
Portland State University
Department of Sociology
P.O. Box 751
Portland, OR 97207-0751

E-mail: dsulliva@pdx.edu
Appendix A: Characteristics of Participating Businesses and Organizations




1: Years operating in the neighborhood: Less than one year (15.9%), 1-3 years (27.3%), 3-5 years (17.0%), 5-10 years (21.6%), 10-20 years (9.1%), and more than 20 years (9.1%). Number of respondents = 88.


Appendix B: Characteristics of Survey Respondents (%)















Number of respondents = 88.

Appendix C: Technical Details of Survey

The survey was conducted during May of 2005. Eleven trained interviewers conducted approximately15-minute face-to-face surveys with 88 Alberta Street businesses and organizations. We attempted to survey all businesses and organizations on Alberta Street from 11th to 30th Avenue. We also surveyed businesses and organizations located within one block of Alberta Street.

The sampling frame was constructed by walking along Alberta Street and recording all the businesses and organizations. Overall, 139 businesses and organizations were recorded. We then eliminated 7 of them from this list because they were owned or operated by the same person. An additional 5 businesses were determined to be vacant and two owners did not speak English well enough to participate. Our final list contained 126 businesses and organizations. To ensure a high response rate and a representative sample, we returned numerous times (and at different times of the day, and on different days of the week) in an attempt to secure an interview. We also sent a postcard that described the survey a few days before approaching the business or organization. Overall, 88 residents participated, 8 did not want to participate (92% response rate). In 29 cases we were unable to make any contact with businesses and organizations.
The survey is a combination of open-ended and close-ended questions. Survey responses were tape recorded unless the participant did not permit it. The open-ended responses were the selectively transcribed.






Appendix D: Additional Statistical Tables

Table A: Opinions about Problems on Alberta Street, by Race (%)1
Blacks Others % difference
Vandalism and graffiti 92.9 89.2 + 3.7
Tension between racial/ethnic groups 78.6 44.6 + 32.8**
Trash in the streets 78.6 79.7 - 1.1
Not enough affordable space for businesses 78.6 50.0 + 28.6**
Burglaries and theft 64.3 67.6 - 3.3
Loud noises 71.4 54.1 + 17.3
Drug dealing 64.3 56.8 + 7.5
Police not caring 64.3 28.4 + 35.6***
Organized gangs 57.1 31.1 + 26.0*
Assaults and muggings 50.0 37.8 + 12.2
Tension between economic groups 57.1 54.1 + 3.0
Not maintaining appearances of business 50.0 51.4 - 1.4
1: Respondents indicate that it is a serious or minor problem.
Note 1: Black respondents = 14, Other respondents = 74.
Note 2: Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*p<1.0, **p<.05, ***p<.01)

Table B: Opinions about Problems on Alberta Street, by Business Type (%)1
Nonprofit For-Profit % difference
Trash in the streets 100.0 76.6 + 23.4*
Burglaries and theft 90.9 63.6 + 27.3*
Vandalism and graffiti 100.0 88.3 + 11.7
Not enough affordable space for businesses 90.9 49.4 + 41.5***
Loud noises 90.9 51.9 + 39.0**
Drug dealing 81.8 54.5 + 27.3*
Assaults and muggings 81.8 33.8 + 48.0***
Tension between racial/ethnic groups 81.8 45.5 + 36.3**
Police not caring 72.7 28.6 + 44.1***
Organized gangs 72.7 29.9 + 42.8**
Tension between economic groups 72.7 51.9 + 20.8
Not maintaining appearances of business 54.5 50.6 + 3.9
1: Respondents indicate that it is a serious or minor problem.
Note 1: Nonprofits = 11, For-profits = 77.
Note 2: Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*p<1.0, **p<.05, ***p<.01)

Table C: Opinions about Problems on Alberta Street, by Business Type and Race (%)1
Black nonprofit Black for-profit Other nonprofit Other for-profit
Organized gangs 85.7 28.6 50.0 30.0**
Drug dealing 100.0 28.6 50.0 57.1**
Burglaries and theft 100.0 28.6 75.0 67.1**
Assaults and muggings 100.0 0.0 50.0 37.1***
Trash in the streets 100.0 57.1 100.0 78.6
Vandalism and graffiti 100.0 85.7 100.0 88.6
Loud noises 100.0 42.9 75.0 52.9*
Tension between racial/ethnic groups 100.0 57.1 50.0 44.3**
Police not caring 100.0 28.6 25.0 28.6***
Not enough affordable space for businesses 100.0 57.1 75.0 48.6*
Tension between economic groups 85.7 28.6 50.0 54.3
Not maintaining appearances of business 57.1 42.9 50.0 51.4
1: Respondents indicate that it is a serious or minor problem.
Note 1: Black nonprofits = 7; Black for-profits = 7; Other race nonprofits = 4; Other race for-profits = 70.
Note 2: Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*p<1.0, **p<.05, ***p<.01)

Table D: Opinions about Problems on Alberta Street, by Various Characteristics1
Education
Less than a high school diploma 7.33
High school diploma 7.44
Associate or technical degree 8.79
Bachelor’s degree 8.84
Graduate or professional degree 9.77
Race***
African American 11.64
Other race/ethnicity 8.31
Art Involvement – No 8.08
Art Involvement – Yes 9.22
Type of Business/Organization**
Restaurant/bar 8.59
Art gallery/studio 9.00
Retail 9.68
Industrial/Non-local clients 6.83
Nonprofit 13.36
Personal Services 6.11
Years in Neighborhood
Less than one year 7.38
1-3 years 8.41
3-5 years 10.13
5-10 years 9.94
10-20 years 10.00
20+ years 6.63
Owner 9.11
Renter 7.95
No Concern about Displacement 8.83
Somewhat Concerned about Displacement 7.40
Very Concerned about Displacement 11.57
Clientele from Neighborhood
None/Few 9.58
Some 9.36
Most/all 8.23
Race of Clientele**
Mostly White 8.40
Mixed 7.19
Mostly African American 12.11
College-educated Clientele
None/Few 10.00
Some 7.70
Most/all 9.60
1: Opinions about Problems on Alberta Street is measured by an index ranging from 0 (no problems) to 24 (everything is a serious problem).
Note: Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*p<1.0, **p<.05, ***p<.01)
Table E: General Opinion of Last Thursday (%)
Completely Positive 53.4
Mostly Positive 12.5
Ambivalent: Positive and Negative 11.4
Mostly Negative 3.4
Completely Negative 13.6
Neutral 5.7
Table F: Last Thursday’s Influence, by Various Characteristics1
Education
Less than a high school diploma 7.33
High school diploma 8.43
Associate or technical degree 6.59
Bachelor’s degree 7.30
Graduate or professional degree 7.13
Race**
African American 5.42
Other race/ethnicity 7.52
Art Involvement – No 6.96
Art Involvement – Yes 7.30
Type of Business/Organization**
Restaurant/bar 7.87
Art gallery/studio 7.67
Personal services 7.53
Retail 7.13
Industrial/Non-local clients 6.50
Nonprofit organizations 5.73
Years in Neighborhood
Less than one year 7.07
1-3 years 7.57
3-5 years 7.00
5-10 years 7.25
10-20 years 7.38
20+ years 5.75
Owner 6.94
Renter 7.31
No Concern about Displacement 7.30
Somewhat Concerned about Displacement 7.43
Very Concerned about Displacement 6.33
Clientele from Neighborhood
None/Few 7.00
Some 7.04
All 7.39
Race of Clientele**
Mostly African American 5.13
Mixed 7.36
Mostly White 7.38
College-educated Clientele
None/Few 7.75
Some 6.86
All 7.36
1: Last Thursday’s influence is measured by an index ranging from 0 (completely negative influence) to 9 (completely positive influence).
Note: Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*p<1.0, **p<.05, ***p<.01)
Appendix E: Alberta Business Survey
(1) I would like to begin by confirming what type of business this is. This is a __________, right?
(1a) Does your business do anything else?
(2) For how long have you have owned this business at this location?
(3) Is this the only place on Alberta Street you have operated this business?
(3a) (IF NO) Overall, how long have you operated your business on Alberta Street?
(4) Do you own or lease this place?
(5) Do you expect to be operating your business on Alberta Street 5 years from now?
(5a) (IF NO or DON’T KNOW) Why not?
(6) Here is a map of the neighborhood. Do you now live or have you ever lived in this neighborhood?
(7) During the last 12 months, has your business been open during Last Thursday?
(7a) (IF YES) About how many times has it been open (for Last Thursday) over the past 12 months?
(7b) (IF YES) Does your business do anything special for Last Thursday? Please describe activities.
(7c) (IF YES) And about how many times have you done something special for Last Thursday over the past 12 months?
(8) Apart from Last Thursday, during the past 12 months, has your business been involved at all in art? For example, have you (a) advertised artists or galleries, (b) created art, (c) exhibited art, (d) sold art, or (e) done anything else related to art [(IF SOMETHING ELSE) Please describe.]
(9) Outside of your business, during the past 12 months have you gone to Last Thursday?
(9a) (IF YES) About how many times have you gone over the past 12 months?
(10) What is your general opinion of Last Thursday?
(11-13) I am going to read you a few statements. Please tell me whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with the statements.
(11) Last Thursday is good for my business.
(12) In general, Last Thursday is good for businesses on Alberta Street.
(13) In general, Last Thursday is good for the neighborhood.
(14) Some people call this area the “Alberta Arts District.” What do you think of this term?
(15) About how much of your clientele would you say live in this neighborhood – all, most, some, a few, or none?
(16) About how much of your clientele would you say are the same race as you – all, most, some, a few, or none?
(17) About how many of your clientele would you say are college-educated – all, most, some, a few, or none?
(18) How would you describe Alberta Street to someone who wasn’t familiar with it?
(19) During the past 5 years how do you think Alberta Street has changed?
(19a) Which of these changes have you liked?
(19b) Which of these changes have you not liked?
(20) Over the next 5 years, how do you think Alberta Street will change?
(21) In an ideal world, what changes would you like to see happen?
(22) In an ideal world, what would you like to stay the same as now?
(23) In your opinion, over the past 5 years has Alberta Street gotten better or worse, or has it stayed about the same?
(24) In your opinion, over the next 5 years, will Alberta Street get better or worse, or will it stay about the same?
(25) Overall, how would you rate Alberta Street as a place to operate a business – excellent, good, fair or poor?
(26-37) Now, I am going to list problems that some business areas have. Please tell me whether on Alberta Street you think they are a serious problem, a minor problem, or no problem at all.
(26) Loud noises, like traffic or music.
(27) Trash in the streets.
(28) People not maintaining the physical appearance of their business.
(29) Vandalism and graffiti.
(30) Burglaries and thefts.
(31) Assaults and muggings.
(32) Drug dealing.
(33) Police not caring.
(34) Tension between different racial or ethnic groups.
(35) Tension between different economic groups.
(36) Organized gangs.
(37) Not enough affordable space for businesses.
(38) Are you concerned at all that you might not be able to afford to stay in this location?
(38a) (IF YES) Would you say that you are very concerned or somewhat concerned?
(39) Are there are any other problems on Alberta Street that I haven’t mentioned?
(40) What race do you consider yourself?
(41) Do you consider yourself Hispanic/Latino?
(42) Which best describes your level of education: less than a high school diploma, high school diploma or GED, associate or technical degree, bachelor’s degree, or graduate or professional degree?
(43) Are there any final comments you would like to add?